by infinitewhite

Question by Purple Moogle: Is the current definition of ‘God’ just a conscious and judgemental version of the laws of physics?
Things people say, like “God is what keeps atoms together” or “Gravity is the active effect of God’s will” or stuff like that makes think that people are simply applying anthropomorphic consciousness to already affirmed physical laws.

Anyone agree or am I just drawing the wrong conclusion here?
Dunamis ~ I mean “current” in the way that modern, rational religious people would describe God.
Haha, nice one Tiara

Misguided: back atcha, kupo~ :3

Best answer:

Answer by Dunamis
Whose definition of God? Muslim, Christian, Hindu, Jew…yours? It’s not your specific conclusion, it’s your generalized question.

Edit: “Rational,” by definition, is bias. Whose definition of “rational” are you using? Atheists and agnostics on this site consider Christians irrational, and visa-versa. Again, you generalize, and generalizations are a sign of confusion.

What do you think? Answer below!

Related Blogs

• Rap-Up.com || Guess Whose Father
• Commodities, Futures, Short-term trading strategies, Let’s Talk Futures
  » Educational

  Understanding Margin » Commodities, Futures, Short-term trading strategies, Let's Talk Futures

• How to Calculate Profit Margin, Calculating the Profit Margin
• whats the difference between leverage and margin? | HelpDeskForex.com
• Style File: Samantha Boardman | RDuJour
• BREAKING: Conclusion to Alaska U.S. Senate race near – CNN …
  -Political Fund USA
• Nancy777 » Blog Archive » #WFJ: TOUCH MY PRESENCE AND MY DUNAMIS POWER
• How to Answer the Salary Question during an Interview without Getting Confused? | Rozee Weblog
• Employment Law: Sex Discrimination – Justification – Margin Of Discretion
• Judge finds Emmanuel Mwamba with case to answer

Question by Purple Moogle: Is the current definition of ‘God’ just a conscious and judgemental version of the laws of physics?
Things people say, like “God is what keeps atoms together” or “Gravity is the active effect of God’s will” or stuff like that makes think that people are simply applying anthropomorphic consciousness to already affirmed physical laws.

Anyone agree or am I just drawing the wrong conclusion here?
Dunamis ~ I mean “current” in the way that modern, rational religious people would describe God.
Haha, nice one Tiara

Misguided: back atcha, kupo~ :3

Best answer:

Answer by Dunamis
Whose definition of God? Muslim, Christian, Hindu, Jew…yours? It’s not your specific conclusion, it’s your generalized question.

Edit: “Rational,” by definition, is bias. Whose definition of “rational” are you using? Atheists and agnostics on this site consider Christians irrational, and visa-versa. Again, you generalize, and generalizations are a sign of confusion.

Add your own answer in the comments!

Related Blogs

• Google launches judgemental search engine | NewsBiscuit
• Answer to the Friday Puzzle….. « Richard Wiseman's Blog
• Nancy777 » Blog Archive » #WFJ: TOUCH MY PRESENCE AND MY DUNAMIS POWER
• “Ask Me A Question” – Justin Barcia and Trey Canard
• Does true science start with a conclusion and then an experiment to support it? | MoSo Technology
• Whose house is of glasse, must not throw stones at another. « jg's Ramblings
• Danger of Deflation Depends on Your Definition of Deflation
• Weighing up the merits of ‘non-judgemental’ ethics classes | ACL
• Qatar has questions to answer for 2022 World Cup | ASU News | The State Press | Arizona State University
• How can I find words by their definition?

by Nathan Rein

Question by Purple Moogle: Is the current definition of ‘God’ just a conscious and judgemental version of the laws of physics?
Things people say, like “God is what keeps atoms together” or “Gravity is the active effect of God’s will” or stuff like that makes think that people are simply applying anthropomorphic consciousness to already affirmed physical laws.

Anyone agree or am I just drawing the wrong conclusion here?
Dunamis ~ I mean “current” in the way that modern, rational religious people would describe God.
Haha, nice one Tiara

Misguided: back atcha, kupo~ :3

Best answer:

Answer by Dunamis
Whose definition of God? Muslim, Christian, Hindu, Jew…yours? It’s not your specific conclusion, it’s your generalized question.

Edit: “Rational,” by definition, is bias. Whose definition of “rational” are you using? Atheists and agnostics on this site consider Christians irrational, and visa-versa. Again, you generalize, and generalizations are a sign of confusion.

Give your answer to this question below!

Related Blogs

by infinitewhite

Question by Purple Moogle: Is the current definition of ‘God’ just a conscious and judgemental version of the laws of physics?
Things people say, like “God is what keeps atoms together” or “Gravity is the active effect of God’s will” or stuff like that makes think that people are simply applying anthropomorphic consciousness to already affirmed physical laws.

Anyone agree or am I just drawing the wrong conclusion here?
Dunamis ~ I mean “current” in the way that modern, rational religious people would describe God.
Haha, nice one Tiara

Misguided: back atcha, kupo~ :3

Best answer:

Answer by Dunamis
Whose definition of God? Muslim, Christian, Hindu, Jew…yours? It’s not your specific conclusion, it’s your generalized question.

Edit: “Rational,” by definition, is bias. Whose definition of “rational” are you using? Atheists and agnostics on this site consider Christians irrational, and visa-versa. Again, you generalize, and generalizations are a sign of confusion.

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

Related Blogs